I REMEMBER THE MOMENT QUITE CLEARLY. It was April 2007. We were standing during the morning worship service. We were standing and singing during the first of two morning services at a church we had never been to before. The church band was playing some snappy song and the pastor was sort of leading us all with the words projected on the wall at the back of the stage. The words, of course, were appropriately mingled with beautiful scenes that served to convey some essence in the meaning of the lyrics.
Suddenly it struck me. This is modern evangelical America. This is it. This is how church is done today. And it is the same, with certain variations to be sure, wherever you go. We visited several different churches in a six month period searching for the right place for us. Each one was just like the other. Even most of the songs were the same. Now, that in itself is neither bad nor condemning. I could say the same for Starbucks. In fact, I consider that element of predictability a value that I appreciate when considering where to go for coffee. So I am not attacking or criticizing the “sameness” of the churches. What struck me was something deeper.
When visiting Starbucks I am in search of some very definite and specific things… great coffee, some tasty goodies to go with the coffee, good background music, and a nice place to sit and chat with Mary. And, oh yes… maybe see a friend or two and share a moment with them. I can count on all or most of these things no matter which of the six or seven Starbucks we may visit. I love it.
Church, however, is not Starbucks. Church, as I understand it, is the body of Christ meeting together to celebrate the Lord and experience the togetherness of our common bond as believers. Whatever the truth of the Gospel of Christ is, the gathering of the church is to be where you are going to experience that truth with some degree of intensity because you are gathered together. So if the Gospel is salvation and freedom and joy and peace, the gathering together of the church would be a time when all these elements are experienced in richness. Right?
However, as William Shakespeare wrote in Hamlet, “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.” If the modern day evangelical church is, in fact, the body of Christ, and as such, most clearly and truly shows God’s love to the world, why is it so completely fragmented, segmented, and defined by its schisms more than its love and acceptance? Is it not at least good stewardship to consider that there might be something inherently wrong foundationally with the modern day evangelical church? Is there even the possibility that some basic assumption carried forth by the evangelical mindset has created a primary misconception that has skewed the message? Could we even rationally entertain such an idea? I say that we must!
I believe that a very foundational premise in the church world is fouled. I am speaking about the gospel, the message of good news given to believers for the world. Just as the heavenly host trumpeted to the shepherds, the message was to be “good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.” However, something has been twisted in the way we have interpreted just what the good tidings are and how the truth of the message is processed into real life. That “twist” is the something “rotten”, not in Denmark, but in modern day evangelical Christianity.
I will attempt to put it in as great a degree of simplicity as I am able to in my own words…
Most of the church world would agree that Jesus’ death on the cross was for the entire world… meaning “all humanity, past, present, and future.” However, from this point is where things get confused. The evangelical belief is that the redemption secured on the cross is but an “offer” from the Almighty. The offer can be accepted or rejected on a completely individual basis. In other words, the divine offer of eternal redemption must be rationally agreed upon by individual human beings and then, and ONLY then, is the power of that redemption ignited within that individual human soul. Any individual who does NOT accept the divine offer, remains void of redemption and is thus a candidate for eternal damnation in fire of hell.
Now, there may be subtle variations on this theme depending on which quarter of Christendom is declaring its particular view, but the basic is relatively the same. Believe and you are in. No belief and you are out. If you remain out and die, all hope for you is gone and you burn in everlasting hell.
So, in the evangelical view of the world, humanity is divided up into two basic groups of people… those who are IN (aka: the saved, the believers, the Christians, the redeemed, the church… this list goes on) and those who are OUT (aka: the unbelievers, the lost, the heathen, the unsaved, unredeemed… and this list goes on and on also).
I, personally, do not like the evangelical version of “gospel”. I think it is, at least in part, the elemental error in the church world. I do not believe their gospel any longer. In fact, I do believe it is quite applicable to quote Paul when he called it “…another gospel: which is not another…” (Galatians 1:6-7) I simply do not believe this is “good news”, and therefore, not the Gospel of Christ.
I believe the good news is that Jesus Christ died on the cross and secured eternal redemption for every human being, past , present, and future whether they believe it or not. That is GOOD NEWS!!! My ability to believe is NOT the criteria God used to determine my eternal destiny. That criteria was the blood that The Redeemer shed for us all.
Now, I am aware this idea brings up many, many wonderful and valid questions that do need to be addressed with specific and sound answers.
Truth has and will continue to endure any and all scrutiny. So, dear reader… formulate your question or your criticism and comment here. As Isaiah wrote so long ago… “Come, let us reason together…!”